<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lockheed Martin Licenses ESP</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.simflight.com/2009/12/01/lockheed-martin-licenses-esp/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.simflight.com/2009/12/01/lockheed-martin-licenses-esp/</link>
	<description>Flight Simulation News, Reviews, Forums</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 15:40:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michel</title>
		<link>http://www.simflight.com/2009/12/01/lockheed-martin-licenses-esp/#comment-6742</link>
		<dc:creator>Michel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 21:05:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://simflight.com/?p=9283#comment-6742</guid>
		<description>Where MS finds big $$$ vs the high cost developement of a product such as FSX, it will go...

FSX for aviation amateurs who are a niche market is not profitable...

Selling its engine for professional training is surely more $ making

Now the competition is bigger between the approved version of XPlane and ESP</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where MS finds big $$$ vs the high cost developement of a product such as FSX, it will go&#8230;</p>
<p>FSX for aviation amateurs who are a niche market is not profitable&#8230;</p>
<p>Selling its engine for professional training is surely more $ making</p>
<p>Now the competition is bigger between the approved version of XPlane and ESP</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Palmer</title>
		<link>http://www.simflight.com/2009/12/01/lockheed-martin-licenses-esp/#comment-6732</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Palmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 08:17:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://simflight.com/?p=9283#comment-6732</guid>
		<description>This isn&#039;t the first big name to jump on the bandwagon (if there even is a bandwagon). MS is willing to kill their studio, but is still willing to go our and push their product. Hmmm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This isn&#8217;t the first big name to jump on the bandwagon (if there even is a bandwagon). MS is willing to kill their studio, but is still willing to go our and push their product. Hmmm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

