To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
There’s no mention of price, or what the “additional aircraft and missions” will be yet, but the development team at Microsoft have released a preview of Flight‘s future direction with three screenshots of their upcoming Alaska expansion pack.
0 Responses
How about a 3rd party SDK instead? Then we can get to work on adding a virtual flight instructor to Flight.
Ill wait for ORBX to be released, and continue to run UTA and Anchorage on FSX.
Hi Paul, I’ve just seen ORBX’s video of Alaska and I have to say I think the Microsoft Flight screenshots and what I know about the improvements to the graphics engine in Flight it compares very well. There are actually a lot of ORBX influances in the Flight scenery detailing which I think was due to ORBX being onboard initially at the begining. I think Microsoft Flight Alaska will be really great and I can’t wait for it to be released!
Cheers,
Dave.
Unless ORBX was ripped off by Microsoft! Which I think such as the other 3rd party developers! Screw MSFT not playing a game simulator!
PS or is it BS. Beside how can you say you have seen ORBX Alaska unless you mean PF? Which works fine for me with Ketchikan. Tongans also works fine to me. Seen the detail in the real world from experience and the Sim world. Plus UTA by Flight1 and Anchorage as well as Dutch Harbor by Aerosoft are great addons. So don’t need the future crap for Alaska Flight nor Flight. Don’t need a game!