6 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Eagleskinner
Wednesday, February 10, 2010 19:57

Oh, by the way – I didn’t see that army truck… in fact the video I see is a Cessna flying over a very central European scenery with FORESTS and LEAVES and GRASS…

Very pretty. And the rest of his work on Youtube.

But I wonder what Cody Jaggyroad would do with that. 😉

Eagleskinner
Wednesday, February 10, 2010 19:45

I’ll go along with “pretty”. I recall a few years (well, a couple of decades ago, in fact) when armies were looking for a good helicopter simulation. They took a “ground based simulation engine” and simply removed the “Stick this object to the terrain mesh” lines out of the code allowing the three and a halfth dimension (i.e. flight at varying altitudes with respect to terrain zero.

If I recall, it was so liked that airforces use similar engines for low level training.

Of course – if you put “military” anywhere in the budget, we’re all paying for it…

PtiSinge
Tuesday, February 9, 2010 01:51

It looks impressive to me. If it doesn’t hold for a very complex flight sim, it could still be great for multiple vehicle sims similar to Armed Assault – the current state of the engine certainly reminds me of ArmA, and it looks prettier.

Monday, February 8, 2010 19:17

Impressive engine indeed. I’m not qualified to say if it’s ready for a technical flight sim or not, but the visual technology is certainly more advanced than FS visual engine IMHO.

Cheers

Monday, February 8, 2010 14:25

Yes, so?