6 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
bt318
Sunday, November 8, 2015 15:24

Acording to flusinews.de Corfu will be developped by Emilios Gemenetzidis (FlyTampa) – the same developer who produced this under the Label of LIVEinFSX for Aerosoft – Aerosoft was only the publisher

Ray
Saturday, November 7, 2015 16:57

If there’s already a decent Aerosoft version of Corfu why are FlyTampa wasting their time on another version? I won’t be buying it despite being a FT fan. With so many other airports in need of improvement this seems like a waste of effort. Milan Malpensa needs professional attention. Why not do that instead?

Christian
Saturday, November 7, 2015 17:11
Reply to  Ray

decent Corfu vs. FT Corfu…an easy choice for me 🙂
is like saying FS9 is a decent sim, why buy FSX or P3D..

Ray
Saturday, November 7, 2015 23:01
Reply to  Christian

It’s a small single runway airport with no jetways. What are you expecting FT to create? Lipstick on a pig is still a pig. If you haven’t bought the Aerosoft version then fine, buy it. But I can’t see many who have buying a duplicate airport.

Alfred
Sunday, November 8, 2015 00:23
Reply to  Ray

Corfu as it should be! Full coverage i expect, like St.Maarten?

btw what is this nonsense about a single runway and no jetways? if that’s all you can understand from a scenery then you have wasted a lot pf money. Just use default my friend, i doubt you will realise the difference.

Chris
Monday, November 9, 2015 08:33
Reply to  Alfred

The “single runway and no jetways” is no nonsense but simply illustrating the fact, that a smaller airport does not offer so many things to make a new FT version superior to the current AS version (from the same designer…). Simply: redoing a bigger airport offers plenty of things to be improved, a “single runway no jetway airport” offers only little. This is completely independent of the quality of the final product…