simFlight
    • FORUM
    • REVIEWS
    • sF NETWORK
      • simFlight.com
      • simFlight Germany
      • simFlight Portugal
      • simflight Benelux
      • simflight España
      • simflight Italia
      • simflight France
      • simflight RUSSIA
      • simFlight China
      • simFlight Japan
      • Privacy Policy
      • Copyright / Impressum
    • simMARKET
      • $$ SALES $$
      • X-PLANE
      • PREPAR3D
      • FSX
      • FSX SE
      • FLIGHT SIM WORLD
      • AEROFLY 2
      • FS2004
      • HARDWARE
      • TRAIN SIM
      • GIFT VOUCHERS
      • MORE
    • SUBMIT YOUR NEWS!
    simFlight
    Editorial

    Microsoft Flight – The Cloud Enigma

    By Miguel Blaufuks18. August 2010No Comments

    Microsoft Flight is the new Live Cloud development from Microsoft announced on the eve of gamescom 2010.  As Miguel B states in an earlier post this seem to be the direction that Microsoft are taking with respect to Flight Simulation.  What next, I wonder – available only on X-Box?  There’s a really kitsch video presumably  featuring the voice of the ubiquitous Ms Patty Wagastaff who throughout this 15 second epic enunciates breathlessly, “I dreamed I could fly” plus a shadowy pin-up photo of the aforementioned (again presumably) Ms Wagstaff.  Nice images no substance.  Will this new strategy send a shiver through third party software developers – it might.

    It depends if Microsoft will allow any developer to add software to its online effort, but history is certainly not on their side.  In some blurb at MS game studios have released they state,”  . . . Microsoft Flight will bring a new perspective to the long standing genre, welcoming everyone, including long-time fans to experience the magic of flight.”  So there you have it fellow simmers we are “long-time” fans!!  Phil Spencer, VP MS Game studios, goes on to say that they are “Reinventing these iconic franchises . . . . marks the beginning our return to PC gaming in bold new ways.”  Simulation is out, gaming is in!

    Microsoft have already launched “Live Mesh” which is a web based system of which lets you connect your personal individual computers (work, home, laptop etc) to your very own online Mesh and then use them remotely from anywhere.  You now connect to what is your new PC environment via a browser.  Basically the “cloud” synchronises any data you  upload via a Mesh desktop to a Mesh folder across all of the computers you have connected to the system and this is accessible to other and yourself from anywhere in the world.   It looks like another neat way of controlling software, you will probably pay a licence fee to use the system, including any software that you may need, for example Office software, etc.  In theory because the business end is on the web and maintained by MS there should be no corruption of any software that you run and individual machine power, settings and quirks become less important.  Of course, by default, it gives Microsoft a bigger hold over what software you can use and buy!  The basis of this new technology, which I believe is a major step forward by the Redmond giant, is simple: communication and sharing!  We shall have to wait and see.

    Microsoft inform us that the key advantages of cloud computing are:

    • Cost. You choose a subscription or, in some cases, a pay-as-you-go plan–whichever works best with your organization’s business model.
    • Flexibility. Scale your infrastructure to maximize investments. Cloud computing allows you to dynamically scale as demands fluctuate.
    • Accessibility. Help make data and services publicly available without jeopardizing sensitive information.

    These key points are important to Flight Simmers, because this may well detail the way that Flight Simulation will develop over the new few years.  What will it mean? Firstly, I don’t think that it will be cheaper to purchase a subscription than it is to buy a software DVD.  As I see it, we would be “purchasing” Microsoft software on demand, ie paying on a per-use and/or we are probably looking at a monthly/annual subscription, but that could mean regular upgrades/updates if it is economically viable.  It is certainly worthwhile looking at the AZURE platform also from MS.  The pricing policies are already laid out and they don’t look cheap!  You get an Introductory special at zero cost for 3 months; Consumption is a pay as you go option (will it cost more to fly from New York to Detroit that it would cost to fly from LA to Heathrow)?; and MSDN premium is presumably for premium services?  There is no hint of cost, just the outlines of these 3 plans.

    In the case of FSX, how would the cloud option handle 3rd pary add-on software?  Would they be added as licensed modules and you would subscribe to whatever module you wanted?  Would there be a section for freebie add-ons, where altruistic simmers could load those goodies?  Frankly, I find it hard to envisage how these last two scenarios might work at reasonable cost.  What will happen to all those expensive add-ons that you purchased for FSX, will there be a “local” add-on feature for them?  Will there even be any backward capability?  Whatever happens, another round of spending seems to be appearing on the (virtual) horizon!

    Is the day of the fast mega core cpu, fast ram and video card over?  Is it going to be more important to have a super-fast internet connection?  I suppose one advantage is that you will be able to fly on your mobile phone.  I wonder if there will be an iphone app??  What happens if every simmer gets online at once, will we back in stutterville?  Is this the end of tweaking as we know it!  I can only see a few options on how to run flight sim software via cloud:  Simmers would probably be able to choose to run the software either via the Internet, using Microsoft Online Services, or through access servers installed on site.  So we may all have to buy a fast server.

    The newest slogan from Microsoft is: “The Cloud – We’re all in!”  Looks like we’re headed for turbulent overcast times and if the price is not right then I’m certainly “all in”.  Somebody once said, “that we should not be afraid of the future”.  I agree, with respect to Flight Simulation, I’m not afraid, I’m terrified, terrified that it will become super hip hop high flying arcade game experience.  On the other hand it will probably enhance the multi-player immersion and may well be able to interact with real world flying.  So maybe there is light at the end of the cloud tunnel!

    Related Posts

    [Video] MSFS 40th Anniversary Release Times – Features Discovery Series : #15 Helicopters

    9. November 20220

    Microsoft Flight Simulator – Sim Update 10 Wait Is Getting Over

    21. September 20220

    Microsoft Flight Simulator – 40th Anniversary Edition on November 11th 2022

    28. August 20220

    No Comments

    1. gg berty2 on 18. August 2010 12:50

      i will stay with fsx for all life no problems.

      Reply
    2. Paul on 18. August 2010 12:59

      Looks and sounds like an Amelia Erhart Mission in the video.

      Reply
    3. Jean.Claude on 18. August 2010 14:59

      Not for me, thanks, will stay with FS9 until I can run FSX on a new machine that will be able to operate it with sophisticated addons as I do with FS9 today… (unlimited framerate).

      That is a real pity! I just hope Aerosoft will be able to unseat MS from their leading position in flight simulation once and for all so that developers can survive and simmers can enjoy their hobby without being ransomed by MS.

      Good luck Aerosoft!

      Reply
    4. Michel on 18. August 2010 15:20

      Simulation or Arcade I do not know, but perhaps MS Flight will be using the same principles as this online hunting simulation game: http://www.thehunter.com

      Reply
    5. Bill Womack on 18. August 2010 17:14

      So that’s one number 1 and a number 4 for the gentlemen. Can I get you anything else? http://iblueyonder.com/microsoft-flight-will-kill-our-hobby/ 😉

      Reply
    6. Miguel Blaufuks on 18. August 2010 22:02

      cool bill! that pretty much sums it up!

      Reply
    7. Paul on 18. August 2010 23:56

      Nice write up Bill on your blog

      Reply
    8. J Garcia on 19. August 2010 0:21

      I will stick with FS9, although I also have FSX, until the chickens come to roost!

      Reply
    9. Jerome B on 19. August 2010 0:52

      The funny thing is that a lot of people talk about these idiots of gamers that have no brain and will kill simulation because MS will cater for them… yet the reaction to the MS announcement seen in the forums is exactly the same as the one seen from the said gamers when Dragon Age 2 was revealed with the same type of brief information. We’re still playing a game, even if it is a solid realistic simulation game, it is an unsupervised hobby, not a proper training tool, aka it’s for fun (which does not exclude education and culture), aka it’s a form of game.
      Anyway, I would hate seeing it transformed into an “arcade” experience, but we really don’t know anything about it. Although, I note that some 3rd party developpers were in the know, and they’re excited about it (go see Orbx forums), so surely the conspiracy theory that says that 3rd party addons will be impossible is probably not justified

      Reply
    10. S Patuel on 20. August 2010 1:13

      Sorry guys but this article is non-sense, zero related to the MS Flight strategy and is based on zero ginformation rounds (as we haven’t disclose anything). We have not mention subscription models for fligth neither integration with non related technologies like Azure subscription (way off target).

      The only thing that I can say is that we want a product that can reach all target audiences, just have some patience, enjoy FS9/FSX and once more news are published you can properly discuss what is coming next.

      Reply
    11. TerribleAviator on 20. August 2010 13:24

      S Patuel, you are right.

      The press release clearly states (in short) it will be a Windows title (Live capable) and Flight will satisfy practically everyone(newcomers and long time fans. That’s it.

      What really baffles me is this: why does Microsoft (again) goes for this shallow teaser thing, while everybody knows a vivid FS community will go nuts with speculation. I expected MS would have learned from the past and be more careful with announcements. FS people are very passionate about their hobby, probably is best not to mess with them. But that is just my humble opinion.

      Reply
    12. peterhayes on 21. August 2010 0:48

      I’d like to respond to S Patuel, who states that my article is non-sense (sic) “as we haven’t disclose (sic) anything”. So S Patuel Microsoft have made NO announcement about the “new” MS Flight running on the Live platform? There is no video as I described it? My article is a piece of (tongue in cheek) conjecture trying to show what the likely scenarios MIGHT BE not those that WILL be! I discuss briefly the current cloud, live, azure etc options that MS MIGHT employ and also give MY opinion on the the pros and cons of such strategy. Whether I am right or wrong is immaterial the thing that we need to do is to get MS’s plans for the new non-disclosed Flight out into the open early so that we do not have the fiasco of FSX and its hastily cobbled together SP1 and SP2 all of which require a CRAY like computer to function. I feel that your response to my article was patronising and demeaning in the extreme and I feel that you could have couched your response in kinder terms and with more positive comments rather than the usual Microsoft negativity. Its obvious that you (the corporate you) have no concept of a free and open society where everything is discussed in an open manner without all of this cloak and dagger secrecy. Terrible aviator says it all.

      Reply
    13. john thorlacius on 21. August 2010 23:53

      you are free to write what you want, and people are free to post their opinion of what you wrote. I must say though that ,and I quote, …”Its obvious that you (the corporate you) have no concept of a free and open society” (wtf!), also…”your response to my article was patronising and demeaning in the extreme” seems to be an overreaction.

      john thorlacius

      Reply
    14. Ian P on 22. August 2010 13:16

      Now you’re over-reacting Peter. My first thought was that this article was wandering off into an alternate reality altogether but, as has already been said, anyone can post conjecture in whatever direction they like.

      However, some of your statements even in your reply are factually incorrect. FSX does not need a “CRAY” to run (indeed a Cray couldn’t run it, I do wish people wouldn’t use that comparison as it is like comparing apples and oranges). MS have released… well, basically, nothing. I think that’s a mistake in itself and they have shot themselves pretty firmly in the foot with an early announcement that causes more confusion than it resolves. Why did they feel pressured into doing that, I wonder? Anyone care to throw more fuel onto the fire with that snippet?

      I do think S Patuel could have phrased the post better (and used a spellchecker if you’re going to represent a company in public!) but “free and open society”? No such thing in business. We know there is the threat of competition out there from at least two companies, although neither of them have announced much yet, either.

      I neither particularly like, nor trust, Microsoft, but I also cannot think of a more local hardware intensive and less “cloud appropriate” application than a flight simulator, either.

      What we can all expect is more conjecture, discussion and argument however much is released, anyway. I can guarantee one thing – whatever MS or anyone else releases in the future, people will be unhappy with it and complain about it. Fun, innit?

      Reply
    15. John Gibson on 22. August 2010 14:32

      Microsoft have lost the plot. If they do not understand that Flight Simulation – to the serious simmer, which most of us are – is not a game what right do they have to our respect? They have produced our base simulations for many years but it irks me that these people, for all their talent, refer to us simmers(driectly or obliquely) as ‘gamers’. Are they part of the simulation industry or not?

      It is insulting. What business person(s) insults their customers? What business person(s) treat their customer base as a lot of dolts?

      I suggest these people take time out for a reality check about our use of virtual reality and flight simulation – and more specifically the many and varied kinds of people who use it, from professional and private pilots down to the home-based hobbyist with an aviation bent.

      Microsoft – wake up and connect with the people who pay your salaries by way of purchases!

      Reply
    16. Ian P on 22. August 2010 15:04

      Can you please post the reference to where you have seen that this will be a “game”, John?

      I’ve seen a lot of nothing so far. A lot people saying that because the word “Simulator” has been dropped it will therefore be a game, but zero evidence to back up that supposition.

      Also, note who makes and publishes the product. It is stored in Microsoft Games. It is developed by Microsoft GAME Studios and departments. It is not a professional tool – that is explicitly stated in the licensing on all versions and almost all add-ons (“For entertainment purposes only” “not for use with real world flight”), it is an entertainment product. Is it a fairly realistic one? That could be argued, but it is and remains an entertainment title.

      ESP was part of the “simulation industry”. It no longer exists. Flight Simulator (from the Bruce Artwick days through to Flight) is an entertainment industry title, not a professional tool.

      Reply
    17. peterhayes on 23. August 2010 0:55

      IanP
      The GAME reference: Please read my post: from Phil Spencer: “Reinventing these iconic franchises . . . . marks the beginning our return to PC gaming in bold new ways.” Yes “PC Gaming” is in the release not “PC simulation”, ie simulation is not mentioned but GAMING is! Go figure!
      My comment about a “CRAY” was IRONIC and probably sarcastic (not a statement of fact) merely alluding to the fact that most posts in the forums state by how much you have to overclock your system to get FSX to run optimally. BTW I didn’t state CRAY, I actually said CRAY LIKE, and for the record my comment was merely rhetorical.
      Yes I admit that I was incensed by the comments that a MS representative made about the post, I merely posed several questions about what form the new “game” might take. Nothing in the post suggests that this is official MS policy. But it did achieve the desired effect and get you all thinking! BTW, how do you know that I am over-reacting and what alternate reality did I wander off into? I expect criticism and will respond appropriately and please tell me what I shouldn’t have put in the article.

      Reply
    18. Tom Constantine on 23. August 2010 5:59

      zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzhuh? wha… ummm zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz.

      Reply
    19. Ian P on 23. August 2010 13:24

      Peter: As far as Microsoft are concerned it is a game.

      That’s not supposition or conjecture, it always has been the case. Therefore, a reference to it being a ‘game’ in that context is irrelevant – in that context, FS9 and FSX are games.

      What I was referring to was information that this new title will be so very different from what came before it? They haven’t yet said so, so we simply don’t know. If, at some point, they announce it will be a pretty and utterly unrealistic game then people can say ‘told you so’, but right now, there’s no evidence to back it up.

      As for over-reacting, I was referring to the whole tone of your post and wasn’t the only one to do so. We’ll just have to disagree, I suppose, and find out who was right when some actual information is released!

      Reply
    20. Dean Mountford on 26. August 2010 1:31

      Did anyone actually notice the video on the site looks like actual game play? Or at least the volumetric waves and water and the color looked right and the sunset and terrain off in the distance? Looks way better than the DX10 preview shots of FSX…

      Guys from what I know Microsoft Flight is going to leave FSX in the dust…

      Reply

    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Recent Comments
    • Mike T on Feelthere – KAUS Austin Announced for MSFS
    • Ian Cooper on Skydesigners – French Polynesia NTTE Tetiaroa MSFS and NTTH Huahine Fare MSFS
    • Sten-Ove Olsson on X-Plane 12 – A330 MCDU Upgrade Progress
    • Sebastien on Just Flight / DC Designs – Concorde MSFS Update 1.0.5
    • Kenneth on Just Flight / DC Designs – Concorde MSFS Update 1.0.5

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

    Your Privacy
    We use cookies to improve your experience on our site and to show you personalised advertising.
    To find out more, read our Cookie Policy
    I am OK with that My Options
    Cookies Policy

    Privacy Overview

    This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
    Necessary
    Always Enabled
    Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously.
    CookieDurationDescription
    cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
    cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional11 monthsThe cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
    cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
    cookielawinfo-checkbox-others11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
    cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
    DSID1 hourTo note specific user identity. Contains hashed/encrypted unique ID.
    PHPSESSIDThis cookie is native to PHP applications. The cookie is used to store and identify a users' unique session ID for the purpose of managing user session on the website. The cookie is a session cookies and is deleted when all the browser windows are closed.
    viewed_cookie_policy11 monthsThe cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.
    viewed_cookie_policy1 hourThe cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.
    Functional
    Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
    CookieDurationDescription
    pid1 yearHelps users identify the users and lets the users use twitter related features from the webpage they are visiting.
    Performance
    Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
    CookieDurationDescription
    YSCThis cookies is set by Youtube and is used to track the views of embedded videos.
    Analytics
    Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
    CookieDurationDescription
    GPS30 minutesThis cookie is set by Youtube and registers a unique ID for tracking users based on their geographical location
    Advertisement
    Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.
    CookieDurationDescription
    ATN2 yearsThe cookie is set by atdmt.com. The cookies stores data about the user behavior on multiple websites. The data is then used to serve relevant advertisements to the users on the website.
    bscThe cookies is set by ownerIQ for the purpose of providing relevant advertisement
    everest_session_v2This cookie is used to display personalized and relevant ads to the users and measure the efficiency of the ad campaign.
    mc1 yearThis cookie is associated with Quantserve to track anonymously how a user interact with the website.
    NID6 monthsThis cookie is used to a profile based on user's interest and display personalized ads to the users.
    pxrc1 monthThe purpose of the cookie is to identify a visitor to serve relevant advertisement.
    rlas311 monthsThe cookie is set by rlcdn.com. The cookie is used to serve relevant ads to the visitor as well as limit the time the visitor sees an and also measure the effectiveness of the campaign.
    test_cookie15 minutesThis cookie is set by doubleclick.net. The purpose of the cookie is to determine if the users' browser supports cookies.
    uuid2 monthsTo optimize ad relevance by collecting visitor data from multiple websites such as what pages have been loaded.
    VISITOR_INFO1_LIVE5 monthsThis cookie is set by Youtube. Used to track the information of the embedded YouTube videos on a website.
    Others
    Other uncategorized cookies are those that are being analyzed and have not been classified into a category as yet.
    Non Necessary
    This is an non-necessary category.
    Save & Accept