8 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
wavn
Monday, December 22, 2008 19:16

Well, I have bought pretty many add-ons in the last year: I think for about EUR 500,–
Until now I both fly in fs9 (mostly big irons) and fsx (planes such as Pilatus, Mooney).
In this buying were Many add-ons of Aerosoft, which are very often for fs9 and fsx.

If the Eaglesoft Citation (which is probably ultimate fitted for fs9 and fsx) should be 1 buy for both (maybe + 10%), I should certainly buy it; now I’am not sure and maybe I don’t buy it at all.

admin
Monday, December 22, 2008 17:31

alberto, yes you should use the comments to voice your views! that’s what the comment feature is here for… many more readers should do the same and hence discuss issues via the comments system! i thank for doing it and hope that many more will do the same!
seasons greetings!

Alberto
Monday, December 22, 2008 15:30

one more thing Francois, just on Simmarket I purchased about 130 addons. I mean that I have always supported the efforts and the work of developers and my not-purchase of those to-me-too-much-expensive products is just my little protest against something wrong to me.

Alberto
Monday, December 22, 2008 15:14

Francois, actually FIAT should gift both of them, they are not worht 1 cent! LOL
Don’t be mad, it was just my personal opinion, maybe I shouldn’t have expressed on comments. I won’t buy the Citation at that price, that’s all but really hope for the people at Eaglesoft that many others simmers will purchase it and they will recouperate their investments. I still wonder why some others sell their products in both versions as single product (at normal price). Maybe they are too much honest…
Cheers.

Monday, December 22, 2008 14:10

So are you saying these developers are ‘dishonest’ for trying to recoup their investments and make a profit so as to make a living?

That’s a rather strange view on the world. Like Fiat should give the Punto for free because they sell enough Croma’s ?

What many people still do not seem to realize is that FSX is MUCH different from FS9 and hence it takes almost DOUBLE the time and effort to make true FS9 and true FSX models. I think most developers also (logically) conclude that customers will EITHER by the one or the other, not both.